Confronting as that would be, perhaps more confronting is something many people do not realise: such a decision would not require any consultation in parliament. Now it is China. The US must operate from a few exposed facilities such as Okinawa and Guam. There is a pathway to a future through peaceful dialogue, but its a hard path, and it needs to be worked.. Tensions continue to simmer . A separatist democracy against a legitimate government? What Would a US-China War Mean for America's Allies and Partners? A Nationwide News Pty Ltd 2023. "I cannot conceive that there are any benefits in Australia being at war with China unless the circumstances were so serious as to make the cost in lives and treasury worthwhile. He spent the bulk. But that would require strikes on Chinas mainland, with all the enormous risks of escalation that could portend. "That's what General Douglas Macarthur found in 1942. The Bashi Channel connects the South China Sea with the Pacific Ocean. Fishing boats could push into ancestral territory, backed up by armed coast guard vessels. China would have to launch an amphibious invasion, deploying troops along its beaches as the first step in a march towards the capital Taipei. Dr Malcolm Davis, a senior analyst with ASPI's Defence, Strategy and National Security Program, told Daily Mail Australia it is increasingly likely President Xi Jinping will order Chinese forces. If a conflict were to erupt in east Asia, then the Chinese military is closer to on par with the United States. "It is not clear how formidable Taiwan'sdefences would prove to be in the face of a Chinese invasion. There are plenty of nations with grievances against China for its South China Sea policy. Russia-Ukraine war: Why does China suddenly seem to want to broker They would be forced to operate as part of a much greater allied unit. Hugh White, who is also Emeritus Professor of Strategic Studies at the Australian National University, is clear in his analysis: "I do not think there is any credible chance that America, with or without Australia's support, could win a war with China over Taiwan." Wherever they start, they finish only when one side decides to give up. One option to attack the man-made islands would be to send in teams of US Marine Raider commandos to destroy weapons systems. A war with China over Taiwan, awful as that would be, involves no Australian national interests. Professor Clinton Fernandes is a former intelligence officer with the Australian Army Intelligence Corps and now Professor of International and Political Studies at the University of New South Wales. Vertical launch systems (VLS) are the modern-day equivalent of the World War II-era big gun. Where are our statesmen?". "As I see the decision for the invasion of Iraq I think it was made by the Prime Minister. Credit:Getty. If Australians are hearing the 'beating drums' of war, as Minister Mike Pezzullo put it, is it because Scott Morrison's Coalition government thinks banging on about China will be a winning . While most members voted in favor of the six U.N. General Assembly resolutions passed since last . Sign up for the weekly What in the World newsletter here. The four have more than 100 years of high-level military and strategic experience between them. But apart from that, Australia has little military value to the US. What would war with China look like for Australia? "For China, the worst-case scenario is to have to conduct high-intensity operations against Taiwan, the United States, Japan and other US allies and partners simultaneously.. We acknowledge Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the First Australians and Traditional Custodians of the lands where we live, learn, and work. "Chinas air defences are likely to prove formidable, but so are US and allied air capabilities. China has demonstrated its capabilities already, including in Taiwan, where it has waged disinformation campaigns, and in serious hacking incidents in the United States. A major war in the Indo-Pacific is probably more likely now than at any other time since World War II. And Australia could be fighting for its survival. the outcome for the U.S. was not a good one, a new report revealed this week. The People's Liberation Army is capable of "substantially subduing" the US Navy in the waters around China, a Communist Party-owned newspaper boasts. For China, the worst-case scenario is to have to conduct high-intensity operations against Taiwan, the United States, Japan and other US allies and partners simultaneously.". The only truly reliable way to counter the threat would be to attack the submarines in port when they refuel and rearm, he writes. But its own submarines, combined with air and land launched missiles, could present an almost constant threat. No emergency stockpiles have been established onshore. "If they think the blockade is failing they may declare victory by pointing to the damage already inflicted, or they might escalate to attacking US forces that are supporting Taiwan. It isn't Ukraine. And in a defensive war, China has the enormous advantage of mass, as Stalin demonstrated after the end of 1942.". That leaves its navy as its primary fighting force. At the last G20 foreign ministers' meeting, in Bali last summer, Lavrov walked out amid condemnations of Russia's war and its impact on global food and energy costs. ", Any US-China war would be primarily a maritime conflict, and it would be, as we have seen, on a scale unprecedented since the Second World War. Answer (1 of 34): I must assume Brian Greenhow is joking, but if he is not I must point out that wars aren't won by population numbers or imaginary 'allies', but by real Alliances, either historical or by treaty, and by technology, military hardware, political maneuvers, industry and money, lots . "This would be followed by a sea-crossing phase, a landing phase and a consolidation phase. The contemplation of war can only be justified after all other means of settling differences have failed, and we are a long way from reaching this position (over Taiwan)," he says. AEST = Australian Eastern Standard Time which is 10 hours ahead of GMT (Greenwich Mean Time), abc.net.au/news/china-us-war-what-would-conflict-look-like-taiwan/101998772, Help keep family & friends informed by sharing this article. For a second day in a row Taiwan has reported a large-scale air force incursion, escalating tensions in the region. And they cannot be rearmed at sea. The People's Liberation Army is the military arm of the ruling Chinese Communist Party, which oversees the PLA through its Central . In such a scenario, any Australian task force centred on its largely undefended troop transports and limited warship escorts would be under extreme risk. "On one hand, if China attacked the US homeland, similar to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour, the US would respond with war. All times AEDT (GMT +11). The only way we can possibly win such a war is to build a coalition similar to NATO. The structure of the military is also different. And a navy. All have been involved in sensitive military operations. These operations would most likely be accompanied by cyber offensives to disrupt electricity, gas, water, transport, health care and other public services. Which is why Dr Davis argues any conflict would likely focus on two strategic waterways the Bashi Channel and Miyako Strait that guard the China Seas. Washington and Beijing are locked in an intense strategic battle. "On the other hand, if the US decided to attack China the provocation becomes essential to decision making. Until then, it is important for Washington to avoid provocations and maintain a civil discourse with Beijing. We should not assume it will attempt this.". "The mobilisation for all this would take many months and US intelligence would detect it and know in advance what was being planned. This means any idea of sustained operations within the Pacific-spanning reach of Chinas ballistic and cruise missiles is likely optimistic. Today, the analysis of Allan Behm, a former head of the International Policy and Strategy Divisions of the Defence Department and Professor Clinton Fernandes, a former intelligence officer in the Australian military, are investigated. China is largely trying to take territorial control, which makes east Asia a likely location for trouble. The military scenario alone is daunting: China would probably launch a lightning air, sea and cyber assault to seize control of key strategic targets on Taiwan within hours, before the United States and its allies could intervene. Space would be the first place both sides would go to strike the others forces in event of a conflict, says Tate Nurkin of the US-based Intelligence Group. That means large paved airfields, humidity-controlled hangars and AI-enhanced maintenance equipment. US vs. China: Who Would Win a War in 2030? - The National Interest "But, in a large-scale war involving many hundreds of thousands of people in offensive and defensive operations, even before reaching the attendant prospect of reaching a nuclear war threshold, Australia is unlikely to make a substantial difference. It may be possible for the US to operate from bases in northern Australia, though whether overflight rights would be granted by Indonesia is unlikely. "This decision over the possibility of war with China could be made more difficult because of ANZUS. The last time Chinese troops saw direct action was 1979 when China launched a costly month-long war against Vietnam to teach it a lesson in retaliation for Hanois actions in south-east Asia. The aim would be to foster confusion, division and distrust and hinder decision making. Russian Struggles in Ukraine Show US Special Operators' Logistics Needs "The military centre of gravity is China's integrated air defence system (IADS) in the south. The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. "America would then have to decide whether to go to war to break the blockade.". The US could no longer win a war against China - news Those are easy targets. The US would be challenged by a powerful Chinese fleet in the region. Beijings tactic of area denial already appears to have been effective. China Joins Russia in Blocking Consensus at G20 Meeting Over the War in Its military budget is greater than the combined expenditure of India, Russia, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. In the recent parliamentary inquiry into war powers reform, the Department of Defence said it didn't think parliament should have authority to decide our involvement because that 'could undermine the confidence of our international partners as a reliable and timely security partner'. Some strategists even use an east-facing map with China at the bottom to show China as being encircled and needing to break out.. February 27, 2023 China's foreign minister Qin Gang will attend the G20 foreign ministers' meeting on March 2. We dont own cargo ships to force vital supplies through any blockade. "People in those days, in the spirit of compromise and understanding, were prepared to work together, if only for a short time. As Australia enjoys all the benefits of a free and open society in a stable and functioning democracy, our principles and values must extend to supporting the survival of Taiwan.. US v China war: If conflict broke out, who would win? US-China war over Taiwan would be biggest since WWII, Australian expert But is Taiwans fate any of our business, as Beijing insists it isnt? In the event of a war: what would Japan, the Philippines, South Korea and Australia do? "One can imagine the sociological fracture in Australia with funerals, commemorations, attacks on Australians of Chinese descent, the curtailing of any progressive economic reconstruction agenda for Australia.". The consequences for us would be very serious in terms of the Australian economy, the impact on the Australian people and the ravages to our way of life throughout the land. It also allows the US to try to promote the notion it is not"an American war". On the military front, the United States should accelerate programs already underway to strengthen and disperse American forces in the Western Pacific to make them less vulnerable to attacks by China. And, in some areas, China may even be ahead. The US has launched 615 satellites into space in the last three years, compared to 168 by China, according to Lowy. With China's rise and democracy's decline, what will the global order look like in 2050? It would be relatively easy for China to establish a credible air and sea exclusion zone around Taiwan, and thereby put immense pressure on the Taiwanese to accept Beijings terms. Grim prediction if war breaks out between US and China - Yahoo! But it has always seemed to me that China, if it decides on military action to force "reunification"is more likely to mount a blockade than an invasion. Would parallel circumstances that led to the invasion of Iraq be "acceptable" in this case? "In the history of the 20th century, it took two world wars to deal with the difficult policy question of dealing with rising powers prepared to challenge the statusquo. There are always a few possibilities that the right thing to do is to go to war irrespective of the expectation that we could 'win' whatever that means. So to contribute to this discussion, Ive sought analysis from four of Australias most experienced military strategists and asked them exactly what Australias involvement in a war with China could look like. Australia's oldest running coal-fired power station is about to close. "When I was born in 1945 the world population stood at about 2.7 billion people. "For my part Australians may be able to defend our nation because of our geographic good luck. Even with robotic flying tanker support, these enormous ships must operate dangerously close to an enemy before their F-18 Super Hornets and F-35B&C Lightnings are of any use. U.S. citizens have grown accustomed to sending their military off to fight far from home. And that takes the issue of US-China military prowess back to the all-important issue of politics. US fighters can operate out of Guam with adequate air-to-air refuelling support, but the round-trip transit time for a sortie is about six hours.". All agree, for example, that the United States with or without Australias assistance cannot win a war against China. "China's leaders could discreetly offer negotiations to Taiwan's leaders during a blockade before the risky step of ordering an amphibious invasion," Professor Fernandes says.